Keir Starmer under pressure to agree exit plan after election mauling

. UK edition

Keir Starmer
Starmer meeting Labour party members at a church hall in Ealing, west London. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA Media

Senior Labour MPs urge prime minister to step down within year as party loses control of 25 English councils and humbled in Wales

Keir Starmer is under pressure to set out a timeline for his departure after a crushing defeat in elections across Britain prompted senior Labour MPs to call for him to step down within a year.

In a disastrous set of results, Labour had lost control of more than 25 councils and more than 1,000 council seats in England by Friday night, many to Nigel Farage’s Reform UK, which made large gains across the Midlands and the north as well as taking seats from the Tories in the south.

After more than a century of domination, Labour has faced near-wipeout in Wales, where the party’s first minister, Eluned Morgan, lost her seat. Labour could slump to third place in Scotland behind the SNP and Reform. In London, a Green surge meant Labour lost control of councils it had dominated, including Hackney and Waltham Forest.

While the prime minister appeared to have avoided an immediate coup, there was a furious response to the results among senior MPs and the unions, with some warning him to change course or risk electoral oblivion. By Friday evening, 10 more MPs had called for him to set out a timetable for departure from No 10.

Louise Haigh, a former cabinet minister and co-chair of the powerful Tribune group of MPs, was the first to break cover. “What is abundantly clear is that unless the government delivers significant and urgent change, then the prime minister cannot lead us into another election,” she said.

One senior backbencher said: “We want Keir to agree a timetable for his departure, but we want it to be dignified. He should have his last conference this autumn and then oversee a leadership contest straight after. He can’t take us into next year’s locals. It’s too late.”

However, Starmer insisted that he “won’t walk away” from the leadership as doing so would “plunge the party into chaos”, although he acknowledged that voters were fed up with the slow pace of change.

The prime minister would deliver a major speech next week in which he would seek to set out a more optimistic vision of the country’s future, Downing Street sources said.

The king’s speech on Wednesday will also include policy announcements, though a cabinet reshuffle is not expected.

On a tumultuous day:

Despite Labour’s losses, allies of Angela Rayner and Andy Burnham, two of Starmer’s potential leadership rivals, said they would keep their counsel and watch how events developed over the weekend.

Wes Streeting was expected to speak to the media after his local council results. But they all appeared to have put any plans for a coup on hold.

As results were declared across the country, several other senior Labour MPs – many thought to be supporters of Burnham who usually refrained from openly criticising the prime minister – went public with their warnings.

Sarah Owen, the chair of the women and equalities committee, said: “Unless Keir Starmer delivers tangible change and truly connects with the public on a human level, he can’t lead us into another election – locally or nationally.”

Anneliese Midgley, the MP for Knowsley, said: “The results here and across the north are beyond our worst expectations. It’s truly devastating. Unless that changes significantly and quickly it’s clear the PM can’t lead us into another election.”

Simon Opher, the MP for Stroud, added: “The public has spoken; I think we need to change our leader. It’s not if now, it’s when. Keir is a decent guy but I think he’s not the right leader for the next election. If we go into the next election with him we will just get slaughtered.”

Several frontbenchers told the Guardian they agreed the prime minister’s time in office should not go beyond the end of the year. “I think it’s clear if he’s still in place by the autumn then efforts to remove him should step up,” said one.

Cabinet ministers and Labour grandees rallied around Starmer as more backbenchers called for him to go.

The housing secretary, Steve Reed, said: “The British public don’t want to hear about timelines, backroom deals and navel-gazing. Let’s get on with the job.”

The business secretary, Peter Kyle, added: “Reversing these results requires a collective effort, not just blaming the boss. We can’t do that by turning in on ourselves. We do it by rebuilding faith in Labour’s ability to inspire and lead our country. Losing our PM is the very opposite of that.”

There will be relief in Downing Street that some of Starmer’s most powerful critics did not directly call for him to quit. The Unite general secretary, Sharon Graham, issued a warning that Starmer must “change or die” but Labour’s trade union liaison group issued a statement that – although critical – called for a change of direction and not explicitly a leadership change.

Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, issued a grave warning that Labour could face the same terminal decline in the capital as it had faced in Scotland, though he did not call for Starmer to resign.

“Labour has lost votes in London to a variety of different parties, but the biggest change has been Labour voters switching to the Greens,” Khan said. “Without a change in course and an acceleration in delivery, the threat to Labour is existential. We risk a repeat in London, Wales and across England of what happened in Scotland, where we have still not recovered.”

Several cabinet ministers have acknowledged privately that even with Starmer’s determination to stay in Downing Street after the election results, the mood on the backbenches is febrile and events could yet spiral out of control over the weekend.

They also admitted that – while they would discourage any move against Starmer now – they did not expect him to lead the party into the next election.

“When your personal brand is so poor, it is seldom retrievable,” one told the Guardian earlier this week.

But Labour MPs who have urged Starmer to move to the left in response to losing votes to the Greens – which in many areas then led to Reform taking seats – were set to be disappointed.

Writing in the Guardian, the prime minister said: “While we must respond to the message that voters have sent us, that doesn’t mean tacking right or left.”

Starmer also faced trouble in his own back yard, as Richard Olszewski, the Labour leader of Camden council, was one of three councillors who lost Holborn and Covent Garden ward to the Greens. He had switched from a seat in the north of the borough at risk from Lib Dems because this one was – supposedly – safer.